It's widely reported or at least implied that the U.S. Navy's first jet airplane, the twin-engine McDonnell XFD-1 Phantom, made its first flight on 26 January 1945 with only one engine installed. Unfortunately, no picture of that momentous event appears to exist, probably because of wartime secrecy. The following picture is of the second XFD-1, which was used for the at-sea carrier trials (you can just see some of the Davis barrier actuation framework in place ahead of the windscreen), and taken some months later.
My fairly well-informed assessment is that this story is apocryphal and resulted from the conflation of two separate events:
1) Early January 1945 high-speed taxi testing at St. Louis with only one engine installed because only one was available. Accomplished prior to an actual up-and-away flight, these are baby steps to evaluate control response, stability (albeit in ground effect), acceleration, braking and steering effectiveness, etc. On at least one of these test runs down the runway the Phantom was briefly airborne, which is not uncommon but certainly does not constitute a flight as it is generally understood.
2) An actual first flight with two engines installed on 26 January 1945.
The single-engine taxi test culminating in a "hop" is documented except for the date. In an article in the September 1946 issue of Aviation, Kendall Perkins (at that time McDonnell's Assistant Chief Engineer) wrote "the first plane, after a number of preliminary tests, made its initial hop (rising a short way off the ground) before the second engine had been installed." In 1981 he gave a presentation on "McDonnell's First Phantom" to the Aeronautical History Society of St. Louis during which he said:
"Well anyway, we flew the airplane in I think it was January of '45, was (sic) the first time. The one interesting, unusual thing about the first flight was that some people didn't even call it a first flight. We took it out of the hangar and we only had one engine at that time. We couldn't get delivery on a second engine, but we were so impatient to get started on taxi testing that we said, well we can taxi it on one engine so we just left a big hole on the other side and taxied it out on the runway and ran it up for a few hundred yards and taxied it back and ran it up a few hundred yards more and it wasn't long before he just took it off the ground. Actually it flew about half way down the runway on just one engine. I don't know whether that a longer flight than the first Wright brothers flight but I suspect it was."
In an undated paper*, "Developmental History of the McDonnell FD-1 or FH-1 Phantom", prepared by the Historian's Office in the Naval Air Systems Command, Washington, D.C. the author(s) wrote:
"(The 19B) engine performed well enough in the October (1944) tests to be delivered to the McDonnell plant, but the XFD-1 needed two engines and only one was on hand; a second was simply unavailable due to technical difficulties. As a result, McDonnell engineers had to be content with installing the single engine and conducting taxi tests at their plant. The second engine finally arrived, and on 26 January 1945 the XFD-1 flew for the first time. The aircraft flew twice that day for a total flight time of 49 minutes."
It seems likely that the author(s) would have used primary sources when writing this paragraph.
An online Phantom summary that doesn't reference primary sources but seems to be credible and provides specific dates: http://tanks45.tripod.com/Jets45/Histories/FH-1/FH-1.htm
In summary, it states that the single-engine "hop" was accomplished on 2 January 1945 with a second engine arriving on 4 January. It was installed for the first flight accomplished by Woodward Burke on 26 January. It also states the flight time on that date as 49 minutes, which is clearly more than a hop.
I'm still hoping that someone comes up with McDonnell test reports from January 1945 that documents whether the up-and-away first flight, as opposed to the "hop", was on one engine or two.
*One of the end notes references a book published in 1972.
T. do you think these early engines would have had enough power climb the aircraft out of ground effect using just one engine? Even assuming one had a really long runway? Makes sense that a short hop in ground effect was possible, but that did not sound like a very long trip...
ReplyDeletePat D
According to the FH flight manual, it would fly away after an engine failure. The drill was to retract the landing gear, accelerate to speeds at which full flaps could be raised to half flaps and subsequently half flaps to flaps up, and then after climbing speed (180 KIAS) was reached, "a climb may be started". "The airplane may be climbed at normal rated power on one engine; however, it is preferable to use military power." A cold day in St. Louis (January), minimal fuel load, new engine, no guns/ammo, minimal fixed equipment and instrumentation, long runway with no obstructions at the far end, it certainly sounds doable. However, this performance was only known as a result of flight test up and away. I doubt that McDonnell would suggest it to the Navy, much less be authorized to attempt it.
ReplyDeleteOne of the end notes references a book published in 1972.
ReplyDeleteposted by Tailspin at 3:08 PM on Jul 15, 2016
What was the name of the book?
Dave C
Supersonic Flight, The story of the Bell X-1 and the Douglas D-558 by Richard P. Hallion, MacMillon Company (New York) 1972
ReplyDeleteSuccess of the single engine "hop" probably due to missing second engine -> less weight, and less drag (probably). Trying to replicate with nonfunctional second engine installed might have been "exciting" for the poor pilot...
ReplyDelete