Thursday, September 12, 2019

F8U-3 vs F4H-1 Dogfights at Patuxent River?

Often when the subject of the Vought F8U-3 comes up on the internet, someone posts something like "Crusader 3 test pilots would often jump the Navy pilots flying the F4H out of Pax River and get the better of them. Then the Navy brass complained and that was the end of the mock dogfights".

That scenario doesn't seem very likely. It is true that NASA Langley in Virginia was bailed the two F8U-3 prototypes for sonic boom studies after the Vought program was canceled. One arrived on 26 May 1959 and the other a month later (the latter was primarily used for spares). Flight tests were accomplished through October 1959 (I don't know the date of the last flight) and both airplanes stricken a month later.
 Langley didn't even bother adding the NASA logo on the tail of its F8U-3s during the five months they were on flight status there.

It is also true that there were F4Hs at Pax River during that time, No. 6 from 27 July to 13 August 1959 for NPE II, initial carrier suitability evaluation, and No. 3 in October, also likely for a couple of weeks, for NPE III, autopilot and air-to-air refueling evaluation. And Pax River and NASA Langley are not all that far apart.

However, No. 6 probably didn't leave the NAS Patuxent traffic pattern much, if at all, except on the ferry flight from St. Louis and the one to return.

I don't know whether there was any overlap between No. 3's visit to Pax in October and NASA's F8U-3 flight status; it's likely that there was and possible that they did tangle at least once.
Note that this picture was probably taken at a later date since No. 3 has a boilerplate IFR probe configuration being evaluated for production.

However, NASA test pilot Donald Mallick flew some of the Langley F8U-3 flights as described in his autobiography (a pdf can be downloaded for free from this NASA website: www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/history/Publications/index.html).
I'm pretty sure that if there was such an encounter, he would have mentioned it.

In any event, given the relatively brief periods of overlap of the two types in the area and the intensive and controlled nature of the flight-test programs involved, it seems very unlikely that there was much opportunity for mock dogfighting. One of the two pilots would have had to have enough fuel after completing the test points on his flight card to go looking to bounce another fighter in his vicinity that turned out to be an F8U-3/F4H  that happened to be airborne at the same time.

3 comments:

  1. Do you remember a Captain Robert Dreesen who provided information for the early edition Ginter books on the 1950 Naval fighters. If you can check Ginter's F4D & F5D books you can see what I think created this. Dreesen spoke of NACA F5D pilots trolling for Crusaders out of Alameda and Moffett when they finished their research work. The F4D book mentions the J79 testing by GE and their pilots engaging in the same kind of activities.

    The first time I read the F8U-3 story it was on a flight sim website over 10 years ago where the kid who wrote it seemed to have lifted Dreesen's words about the F5D just changing the location to Patuxent and the aircraft to the F8U-3 & F4H. Since then I have seen variations of that story pop up on what are suppose to be serious aviation websites.

    So has one heard of this story before the internet arrived?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow, I thought I was the only one still around that flew the old birds: F-9 Cougar, F-11 Tiger,
    F-4a/F4H, F-8u, F-4b,j,s, and
    F-18a.
    I'm a retired M.D., PhD, and have lots of time to relay "fact, funny, and terrifying" stories.
    Let me know if you need some written material on any and all of the planes I've noted. It would be a pleasure. Bob Carson

    ReplyDelete
  3. Fascinating to see a myth like this settled. I'm a member of an aviation history site, and there's been lots of myths that were dispelled there.

    It's amazing how, if a story is repeated enough times, it becomes accepted as fact.

    ReplyDelete